Peer Review Process
After the article passes the plagiarism checking stage, and editor or editor section check, each manuscript will be reviewed by at least three independent referees who are within the subject area.
Peer review is a critical element of scholarly publication, and one of the major cornerstones of the scientific process. Peer Review serves two key functions:
A-Acts as a filter: Ensures research is properly verified before being published
B-Improves the quality of the research: rigorous review by other experts helps to hone key points and correct inadvertent errors.
1-First screen: Editor or section editor check scope, language, plagiarism, .....etc
Click to See More
First Screen by Editor or editorial board
The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
* Yes No
The manuscript within the specialized of our journal orientation.
* Yes No
The sobriety of manuscript language .
Yes No
Using update and sober international references and not including more than one conference paper.
* Yes No
The manuscript follows the structure of a scientific article.
* Yes No
Did all references relate to the current work?
* Yes No
Paper Novality?
* 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
The Decision " Accept, Revision required, Decline"
2-Review form: The editorial board and/or international three reviewers check the quality of the article. Please note:
Click to See More
Please Read Reviewer Guidelines
Please select a number to indicate your level of agreement with the following questions. Select the lowest value (1 Star *) to indicate that you disagree entirely, or the highest value (5 Stars *****) to indicate that you agree completely.
The Manuscript is within the scope of TJES journal
The Manuscript title reflects the content and purpose of the research.
Your comments about Manuscript title (optional)
The abstract includes information important for understanding the content of the Manuscript?
Your comments about abstract (optional)
The introduction clearly defines the purpose and objective of the work
Your comments about the introduction (optional)
A review of previous studies is solid and up to date?
The methodology is clear and adequate?
your comments about methodology (optional)
The results and discussions are adequate?
your comments about results and discussions (optional)
The conclusions is based and contributes to the discharge of treated problems?
Your comments about conclusions (optional)
The references reflect the topicality of the article, and up to date?
Are all references related to the present work?
Specify the unrelated refrences if any?
The Manuscript is free of technical errors?
The figures are clear & do clearly convey the intended message?
The Tables are clear & do clearly convey the intended message?
please rate the novelty of the study?
Does this Manuscript make sense?
Comments to the Authors:
Comments to TJES Editor:
Reviewer Recommendation
Do you want to check the manuscript after authors' response?
The Decision " Accept, Revision required, Decline"
3-Check Manuscript (revision) by Reviewer
Click to See More
This form used to check the revised manuscript
Does the Author Consider all your comments?
Please Specify?
Comments (Please specify: where the Author's failure to answer the reviewer's questions)? This text will appear for Author/Authors
Comments for Editor? if any?
Suggest Reviewers if any? this item for section editor ? And the reviewer can fill it if he wants to do so?
Please write Name, e-mail, phon no., and affiliation for every reviewer
Did all references relate to the current work? Please identify the references numbers that are not related to the research?
4-Final Screen By Editorial Board
Click to See More
Final Check By Section Editor
Please answer with “Yes” or “No”. if your answer is No then insert your comments in the comments box. If all answers are “Yes” then put No comments.
The researchers modified the Manuscript considering all the required adjustments as requested by the editorial board.
The researchers modified the Manuscript considering all the required adjustments as requested by the reviewers
Plagiarism ratio of less than 20%?
The Manuscript is printed according to the TJES template
Manuscript language is sobriety?
Your comments
Please write your opinion if one or two reviewers reject the Manuscript? Do you think the reviewer's notes amount to a rejection of the Manuscript?
Other comments if any
The Decision
Please choose one
Decline"
5-Submit the Final version of the Manuscript to publishing in TJES?
The author must upload final version, the author must note:
1-You must re-write your article according to Author Guidline.
2-The final version must include full details about authors (E-mail-affiliation-ORCID)
3-If you use EndNote program you must APA references style, you can find in Author Guidlines more details.
4-You may add new references form our journal. To see new article published in tikrit journal of engineering sciences click here.
5-The acknowledgment section should not include the financial support allocated for the research.
6-Author Final Check of Article Before Publishing
After typeset complete
The corresponding author receives a final copy of the manuscript in discussion field within the production tab. The corresponding author must make notes and modifications, if any.
The author must know that the manuscript after its publication cannot be made any modification.
Please note: if the modification is very necessary the author can submit erratum.
Erratum: a correction of a published text. As a general rule, publishers issue an erratum for a production error (i.e., an error introduced during the publishing process) and a corrigendum for an author’s error. It is usually bound into the back of a book, but for a single error, a slip of paper detailing a corrigendum may be bound in before or after the page on which the error appears. An erratum may also be issued shortly after its original text is published (not more than 1 week).