The Effect of Varying Maximum Aggregate Size and Reinforcement Ratio on the Behavior of Reinforced Shear Key Specimens with Normal Steel Under Direct Shear
Main Article Content
Abstract
When designing concrete structural members subjected to different types of stresses, it is essential to optimize the contribution of all structural components. In the design of shear reinforcement for beams, the contribution of longitudinal bars to shear resistance is typically neglected, as they are mainly intended to resist bending stresses. This study investigates the influence of varying the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and maximum aggregate size on the behavior of shear key specimens. The experimental program includes nine specimens, incorporating three maximum aggregate sizes (2 mm, 4 mm, and 9 mm) and three reinforcement ratios (minimum, average, and maximum). After performing the required tests, the shear stress, slip, and dilation values were determined and compared among the specimens. The results demonstrated that increasing the maximum aggregate size enhanced the shear capacity when the reinforcement ratio was at its minimum. Conversely, when the reinforcement ratio was increased to its maximum level, the shear capacity decreased with increasing aggregate size.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI. (2014). In Design and Construction Guide of Externally Bonded FRCM System for Concrete and Masonry Repair and Strengthening (ACI 549. American Concrete Institute.
Al-Shathr, B. S., Al-Attar, T. S., & Hasan, Z. A. (2016). Effect of curing system on metakaolin based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Babylon University, 24(3), 569-576.
Al-Quraishi, H., Lafta, M. J., & Abdulridha, A. A. (2018). Direct Shear Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Elements. Journal of Engineering, 24(1), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2018.01.16
Birkeland, P. W. B. and H. W. (1966). Connections in Precast Concrete Construction. ACI Journal Proceedings, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.14359/7627
Iraqi Specification, No. 5/1984. Portland Cement. Central Agency for Standardization and Quality Control, Planning Council, Baghdad, Iraq.
Iraqi Specification, No. 45/1984. Aggregate from Natural Sources for Concrete and Construction. Central Agency for Standardization and Quality Control, Planning Council, Baghdad, Iraq.
Khayat, K. H., & Feys, D. (2010). Design, Production and Placement of Self-Consolidating Concrete. RILEM Bookseries, 1, 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9664-7
Paulay, T., Park, R., & Phillips, M. H. (1974). Horizontal construction joints in cast-in-place reinforced concrete. American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication, SP-042, 599–616. https://doi.org/10.14359/17303
Samantha Lynn Wermager. (2015). Shear-friction of sand-lightweight clay and slate aggregate concretes with varied reinforcement ratios.
Shariatmadar, H., Khatamirad, M., & Zamani, E. (2013). Pre-Cracked Concrete Shear Strengthened with External CFRP Strips. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 1(1), 29–38.
