Main Article Content

Noaf R. A. Al-Rifaia NR230074en@st.tu.edu.iq
Farouk. M. Muhauwiss dr.faroukmajeed@tu.edu.iq


Abstract

Gypseous soils are prone to loss of strength due to the dissolution of gypsum and subsequent structural collapse, especially when they are wet. As a result, it requires environmentally friendly and sustainable treatments, such as recycling building waste and utilizing it to enhance the properties of the soil. In order to improve gypseous soil, this study employed a ceramic waste powder-based geopolymer. This method offers favorable environmental and mechanical properties, working as a sustainable alternative for ordinary Portland cement. It depends on using raw materials that are high in alumina and silica. Various amounts of ceramic powder are applied to three gypseous soils with variable gypsum content (20, 30, and 53%). 6 M sodium hydroxide and a 1:2 ratio of sodium hydroxide to sodium silicate were used to prepare the alkaline activator. Direct shear tests were performed on specimens in both dry and soaked states to evaluate soil behavior under different loading conditions and to determine the shear strength parameter (cohesion C and the angle of internal friction ϕ) for treated and untreated soil. After the soil is treated with a ceramic waste powder-based geopolymer, its shear strength increases. As a binding agent, this geopolymer fills up spaces and improves soil particle cohesiveness. It has a comparable effect to cement in terms of increasing shear resistance and cohesion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Al-Rifaia NRA, Muhauwiss FM. Shear Strength of Gypseous Soils Enhanced by Ceramic Powder-Based Geopolymers. j. adv. sci. eng. technol. [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 24 [cited 2026 Feb. 9];8(1). Available from: https://www.jasetj.com/index.php/jaset/article/view/1218
Section
Articles

References

Hassan, N. A., Ahmed, H. A., & Mohammed, A. K. (2024). Original Research Article: Enhancing the engineering properties of gypseous soils by adding the Anthan polymers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ace.v7i1.2828

Fattah, M. Y., Al-Obaydi, M. A., & Al-Jalabi, F. A. (2018). Effect of number of piles on load sharing in a piled raft foundation system in saturated gypseous soil. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol, 9, 932-944.

Muhauwiss, F. M. (2018). Physical properties of gypseous soil after gypsum removal using EDTA solution. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 25(2), 68-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.25.2.09

Majeed, A. H., & Al-Rkaby, A. H. (2023). Improving weak soils with reinforced stone columns. 3c Tecnología: glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme, 12(2), 78-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.78-91

Awn, S. H. A., Abd-Alsattar, W., & Abbas, H. O. (2012). Improvement of gypseous soil by compaction and addition of cement. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 74-88.

Awn, S. H. A. (2011). Improvement of gypseous soil by pre-wetting. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2011.04105

Al-Juari, K. A. (2009). Volume change measurement of collapsible soil stabilized with lime and waste lime. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 16(3), 38-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.16.3.04

Muhauwiss, F. M., & Hassoun, S. S. (2021). Effect of wetting and drying cycles on the durability of gypsum soils treated with calcium chloride or cement additives. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 28(2), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.28.2.07

Hussein, A. H., Muhauwiss, F. M., Hassan, N. A., & Theyab, A. F. (2023). Evaluating the shear strength of agar gum-treated gypseous soil. In Smart Geotechnics for Smart Societies (pp. 498-504). CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003299127-60

Ayeldeen, M., Negm, A., El-Sawwaf, M., & Kitazume, M. (2017). Enhancing the mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers. Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 9(2), 329-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.11.007

Al-Obaidi, A. A., Al-Mukhtar, M. T., Al-Dikhil, O. M., & Hannona, S. Q. (2020). Comparative study between silica fume and nano silica fume in improving the shear strength and collapsibility of highly gypseous soil. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 27(1), 72-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.27.1.10

Theyab, A. F., Muhauwiss, F. M., & Alabdraba, W. M. (2020). Effects of xanthan gum biopolymers on gypseous soils characteristics. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.27.2.03

Muhauwiss, F. M., Hussein, A. H., & Hussein, M. A. (2024). Shear strength durability investigation for gypseous soil enhanced by pectin biopolymer. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 31(2), 175-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.31.2.17

Sbahieh, S., McKay, G., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2023). Comprehensive analysis of geopolymer materials: Properties, environmental impacts, and applications. Materials, 16(23), 7363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237363

Raoof, S. M., & Hameed, A. M. (2025). Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Mortar Produced from Fire Brick and Ceramic Waste. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1515.v1

Mahmood, T. E., Hamed, M. H., & Ibrahim, A. K. (2023). Geotechnical Behaviour of Gypseous Soil Treated by Geopolymer Additives. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2023.160409

Murmu, A. L., & Patel, A. (2020). Studies on the properties of fly ash–rice husk ash-based geopolymer for use in black cotton soils. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 6, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00224-z

Ahmad, M. M., Muhamad, K., Razak, R. A., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Hashim, N. H., & Othman, N. A. F. (2023, July). The effect of fly ash on the alkaline activator ratio on the mechanical properties of stabilized lateritic soil using fly ash-based geopolymer. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1216, No. 1, p. 012029). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1216/1/012029

Leong, H. Y., Ong, D. E. L., Sanjayan, J. G., & Nazari, A. (2018). Strength development of soil–fly ash geopolymer: Assessment of soil, fly ash, alkali activators, and water. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(8), 04018171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002363

Kasehchi, E., Arjomand, M. A., & Elizei, M. H. A. (2024). Experimental investigation of the feasibility of stabilizing inshore silty sand soil using geopolymer based on ceramic waste powder: An approach to upcycling waste material for sustainable construction. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, e02979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02979

ASTMD3080/D3080M-11. (2011). “Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM D1556/ D1556M-15e1. (2015). “Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by Sand-Cone Method.” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM D1557-12e1. (2012). “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM D4318. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.