Technology Acceptance Models to Improve Adoption of Health Information Systems
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Technology acceptance model (TAM) used to enhance understanding of technology acceptance in the workplace as healthcare environment. The use of technology in the healthcare environment improves healthcare outcomes, control the healthcare data, improve collaboration and skills among healthcare staff and reduce organizational expenses. Recent literature studies done indicated lack of adoption of technology as the health information systems (HISs), this be affect on collaboration among healthcare staff this in turn affect on healthcare outcomes and medical research findings. This research attempts to address the aforementioned issues by applying the extended TAM based on relevant models. This research identifies success factors influencing the adoption of HISs in healthcare environment. This research employed the exploratory qualitative research method to collections the required data. Results of this study shows that factors such as data confidentiality "security and privacy" becoming more important in addition to current factors such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, quality” system and information". Beside to, privacy factor have significantly affect the intent to use and the adoption of HISs by healthcare staff.
© 2018 JASET, International Scholars and Researchers Association
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
Aggelidis, V. P., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2009). Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(2), 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006
Alavi, M., & Carlson, P. (1992). A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 45-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517938
Ammenwerth, E., Brender, J., Nykänen, P., Prokosch, H.-U., Rigby, M., & Talmon, J. (2004). Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(6), 479-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.04.004
Anderson, J. G. (1997). Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(8), 83-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/257874.257895
Ash, J. S., Berg, M., & Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(2), 104-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1471
Belanger, F., Hiller, J. S., & Smith, W. J. (2002). Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 245-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5
Berg, M. (2001). Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(2), 143- 156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00200-3
Boulos, M., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-
Acknowledgment
The researchers appreciate the role of the Cancer Treatment Institute, Cairo University–Egypt. We are also grateful to all the participants in this study and to the University of Malaya for their interest in and support for this research.
based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC medical education, 6(1), 41.
Chetley, A. (2007). Improving health, connecting people: the role of ICTs in the health sector of developing countries: A framework paper: InfoDev.
Chismar, W. G., & Wiley-Patton, S. (2003). Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174354
Cho, H., Rivera-Sánchez, M., & Lim, S. S. (2009). A multinational study on online privacy: global concerns and local responses. new media & society, 11(3), 395- 416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808101618
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research: Prentice Hall.
D’Ambra, J., & Rice, R. E. (2001). Emerging factors in user evaluation of the World Wide Web. Information & Management, 38(6), 373-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00077-X
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Asmaa Hatem Rashid et al. / Journal of Advanced Sciences and Engineering Technologies vol (1) 2018
Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 19(4), 9-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2004). Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents-measurement validity and a regression model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(6), 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001715723
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
Dinev, T., Hart, P., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance–An empirical investigation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(3), 214-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.09.002
E. Ammenwerth, S.Gräber, G.Herrmann, T.Bürkle, & J.König. (2003). Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 71(2), 125-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00131-X
Eisenstein, E. L., Diener, L. W., Nahm, M., & Weinfurt, K. P. (2011). Impact of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS) upon the Design and Operation of Multi-center Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Research Study. Journal of medical systems, 35(6), 1521-1530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9429-8
Ernstmann, N., Ommen, O., Neumann, M., Hammer, A., Voltz, R., & Pfaff, H. (2009). Primary Care Physician's Attitude Towards the GERMAN e-Health Card Project—Determinants and Implications. Journal of medical systems, 33(3), 181-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9178-0
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fontanella, B. J. B., Ricas, J., & Turato, E. R. (2008). Amostragem por saturação em pesquisas qualitativas em saúde: contribuições teóricas [Saturation sampling in qualitative health research: theoretical contributions]. Cad. Saúde Pública, 24(1), 17-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2008000100003
Hernandez, J. M. C., & Mazzon, J. A. (2007). Adoption of internet banking: proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(2), 72-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320710728410
. Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2007). A review of medical error reporting system design considerations and a proposed cross-level systems research framework. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(2), 257-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X312487
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009). A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(1), 21-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601138245
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). Methodological Review: The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of biomedical informatics, 43(1), 159-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 91-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 61(2), 69-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107
Katos, V. (2009). An integrated model for online transactions: methodological issues and challenges. Methodological Innovations, 4(3), 27-40.
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Committee on Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine: Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
. Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., & Faxvaag, A. (2001). Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ, 323(7325), 1344- 1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344
Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2005). A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. Mis Quarterly, 461-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148692
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75): Sage Publications, Inc.
Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00049-5
Lorenzi, N. M., Novak, L. L., Weiss, J. B., Gadd, C. S., & Unertl, K. M. (2008). Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. Journal of the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2583
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Engineering Technologies (2018) Vol (1) 17-29
American Medical Informatics Association, 15(3), 290- 296.
Lu, Y. C., Xiao, Y., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2005). A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(5), 409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.001
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
Marshall, W. W., & Haley, R. W. (2000). Use of a secure Internet Web site for collaborative medical research. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 284(14), 1843-1849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.14.1843
Melas, C. D., Zampetakis, L. A., Dimopoulou, A., & Moustakis, V. (2011). Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: An extended TAM model. Journal of biomedical informatics, 44(4), 553-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.01.009
Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2001). E-commerce systems success: An attempt to extend and respecify the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4), 131-141.
Palmer, J. W. (2002). Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 151-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114
Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00022.x
Ruxwana, N. L., Herselman, M. E., & Conradie, D. P. (2010). ICT applications as e-health solutions in rural healthcare in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Health Information Management Journal, 39(1), 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/183335831003900104
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
Scott, R. E. (2007). e-Records in health—Preserving our future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(5), 427-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.007
Shortliffe, E., Barnett, G. O., Cimino, J., Greenes, R., Huff, S., & Patel, V. (1996). Collaborative medical informatics research using the Internet and the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium.
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. Mis Quarterly, 167-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249477
Straub, D., Limayem, M., & Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.8.1328
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International journal of human-computer studies, 64(2), 53-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. Mis Quarterly, 561-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
Teo, T. S., & Choo, W. Y. (2001). Assessing the impact of using the Internet for competitive intelligence. Information & Management, 39(1), 67-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00080-5
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly, 425-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wears, R. L., Cook, R. I., & Perry, S. J. (2006). Automation, interaction, complexity, and failure: A case study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(12), 1494-1501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.009
Wong, L. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using NVivo. Malaysian Family Physician, 3(1), 14-20.
Yarbrough, A. K., & Smith, T. B. (2007). Technology Acceptance among Physicians A New Take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(6), 650-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707305942
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251- 280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453